Skip Navigation Links
October 2021 - 2nd EditionExpand October 2021 - 2nd Edition
October 2021Expand October 2021
July 2021Expand July 2021
May 2021Expand May 2021
April 2021Expand April 2021
January 2021Expand January 2021
November 2020Expand November 2020
July/August 2020Expand July/August 2020
May/June 2020Expand May/June 2020
March/April 2020Expand March/April 2020
January/February 2020Expand January/February 2020
September/October 2019Expand September/October 2019
July/August 2019Expand July/August 2019
May/June 2019Expand May/June 2019
March/April 2019Expand March/April 2019
January/February 2019Expand January/February 2019
November/December 2018Expand November/December 2018
September/October 2018Expand September/October 2018
July/August 2018Expand July/August 2018
May/June 2018Expand May/June 2018
March/April 2018Expand March/April 2018
January/February 2018Expand January/February 2018
November/December 2017Expand November/December 2017
September/October 2017Expand September/October 2017
July/August 2017Expand July/August 2017
May/June 2017Expand May/June 2017
March/April 2017Expand March/April 2017
January/February 2017Expand January/February 2017
November/December 2016Expand November/December 2016
September/October 2016Expand September/October 2016
July/August 2016Expand July/August 2016
May/June 2016Expand May/June 2016
March/April 2016Expand March/April 2016
January/February 2016Expand January/February 2016
November/December 2015Expand November/December 2015
September/October 2015Expand September/October 2015
July/August 2015Expand July/August 2015
May/June 2015Expand May/June 2015
March/April 2015Expand March/April 2015
January/February 2015Expand January/February 2015
ArchiveExpand Archive
Special Edition - EPRExpand Special Edition - EPR
Special Edition: Title V Technical Assistance MeetingExpand Special Edition: Title V Technical Assistance Meeting
Title V Technical Assistance Meeting

 Health Equity in Action: The Learning and Action Tool for State Health Departments

By Julia Heany, PhD
Center for Healthy Communities
Michigan Public Health Institute

Angela Precht, MSW, MPH
Special Projects Manager
Center for Healthy Communities
Michigan Public Health Institute

children-450925_1920.jpgAs the field of public health turns attention toward addressing social determinants of health (SDoH) and the root causes of social and economic inequities, public health departments seek strategies for identifying and addressing gaps in their capacity to effectively advance health equity. The Foundational Practices for Health Equity: A Learning and Action Tool for State Health Departments  – developed through the Health Resources and Services Administration's (HRSA's) Collaborative Innovation and Improvement Network for Infant Mortality (IM CoIIN) –  introduces a set of seven foundational practices to advance health equity. The tool was designed to encourage reflection and discourse about the capacity of state public health departments to address SDoH and advance health equity and to support departments in building competencies to advance health equity.

Prior to releasing the tool, its developers piloted it among a small group of states – Wisconsin, North Carolina, and Nebraska – between March-August 2017. The developers then partnered with the Michigan Public Health Institute's Center for Healthy Communities, which evaluated the pilot with the goal of learning about the piloting states' experiences with the tool and developing lessons learned, including opportunities for improvement. The goal of this evaluation was to inform improvements to the tool and assess its promise for achieving outcomes. The states participated in key informant interviews and a focus group and responded to an online survey.

The evaluation found that: 

  • States decided to pilot the tool because it was seen as a natural complement to their other efforts.
  • States used a variety of strategies to engage with the tool, but they all used a combination of individual and group review, struggled to find enough time, and planned to continue engaging with the tool past the pilot period.
  • Participants identified several emergent outcomes associated with using the tool:
      • It generated important conversations and supported learning challenging concepts.
      • It helped build competencies.
      • It spurred action or, more commonly, laid the ground for action.
  • Participants noted several strengths of the tool:
      • The background section was informative and helpful.
      • The foundational practices provided a clear and complete organizational structure.
      • The critical capabilities and discussion questions were clear and helpful in spurring discussion.
  • Participants also noted several helpful suggestions for improving the tool:
    • Offer states an orientation to the concepts in the tool, as well as the tool itself.
    • Include more guidance in the instruction section.
    • Offer suggestions and examples of how the tool can be used by public health departments.
    • Include or link to strategies public health departments can use to go from discussion to action.
    • Suggest strategies for identifying priorities and assessing improvement over time.
    • Provide recommendations for how to encounter the interrelated nature of the practices.

These findings suggest that the tool shows promise for achieving its intended outcomes for state public health departments and that key revisions and additions will make the tool more accessible and actionable. According to Jeanette Kowalik, co-project director of the IM CoIIN SDOH project at AMCHP, the tool will be used as a part of the 13-state needs assessment. The utility of the tool will be discussed post-administration, so stay tuned for an update. The goal is to continue to share the tool with local and state health departments so that they may benefit from its systematic features and enhancements to strategic planning.

For more information about the tool and to see the tool itself, visit:

"We are now working on bringing all strategies together under one framework. This is why it was exciting to be able to use this self-assessment Tool because it really brings together everything we've been working on in the last few years under one health equity approach. Not just understanding where the unfair difference is but really start to frame this into how we start to put into place strategies that stress fairness in resources and fairness in our narrative."

-Pilot Participant